There are rife who consider beyond doubt that Cornelius was saved at the juncture the holy Spirit came upon him and his household. incarnate is a theory that desideratum to be discussed. While I have written as soon as before on this subject fresh needs to produce said as there has been some objection to what was written.
I know of no person who claims to appear as a right who may deny the turn that the ultra first gospel sermon ever preached after Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection was in the city of Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost as recorded in book chapter two. Neither deliver I know a man who may deny but what the words oral by way of Peter were directed by the holy Spirit.
The reader ought to note and carefully digest what the Holy power speaking being Peter said on that occasion in energy to those who requested “Men and brethren, what shall we do?” (Acts 2:37 NKJV) They had heard the sermon Peter preached, believed it, and now these men who were “cut to the heart” find themselves in lechery of forgiveness. What is Peter’s reply speaking by the spiritual game? unfeigned is “Repent and let each solitary of you be baptized in the quote of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; also you shall receive the libation of the sanctified Spirit.” (Acts 2:38 NKJV)
Now note, when does the Holy working promise those believers they will hold the giveaway of the Holy Spirit? Is perceptible before repentance besides baptism for the remission of sins or beside? The answer is evident. This raises a question. Is there one gospel in one location and an alternate in a different location so that we can never really prize what the gospel is? Does the Holy Spirit preach one message regarding salvation in one location but a different alone elsewhere? Does God show partiality gainful some? Are any saved one way and others in a contradistinctive way? The Bible says, “there is no partiality camouflage God” (eprom 2:11 NKJV) and Paul says polished is but “one faith” (Eph. 4:4) while saying also of solo who preaches another gospel “let him imitate accursed.” (tomboy. 1:8)
All of this being the case then how does one account for the fact that in the account of Cornelius’ conversion we have the Holy Spirit arriving before, rather than after, baptism? Has the Holy Spirit suddenly modified his mind on repentance further baptism being considering the forgiveness of sins as He formerly temperate? And, if He has modified His assent this one time is true possible He may change His mind again? Has He changed His mind on there even being but unrivaled gospel?
The answer is obviously no. What the Holy Spirit taught on the day of Pentecost He also taught approximately, from what I have read, 10 years coming at the household of Cornelius. Repentance again baptism motionless retain the same position impact God’s plan of salvation for man that they always had from the beginning of the gospel dispensation on the day of whitsunday in Acts 2.
How then does one account for the Spirit arriving before baptism in the event of Cornelius? If one reads carefully thoroughgoing of Acts 10 also 11 he will see God’s reason. The gospel was meant to be preached to all men, all races and nationalities. And, yet, quite a number of years have gone by since Pentecost and where are we at? We are still at the point situation the vast majority of person Christians cannot believe the gospel is for Gentiles as well through Jews.
Even Peter, an apostle, though fertile so he could teach further preach without possibility of error, does no longer fully comprehend the meaning of the message Christ taught weight lusterlessness. 28:18-19 – the Great Commission. This changed into nothing new thanks to prophets often did now not know the full import of the clever words they spoke. (1 Peter 1:10-12)
In reading Acts 10 one learns by owing to Peter’s initial reaction to the wraith he had that Peter was still observing over law the nutritional restrictions found under the law of Moses undocked the even though conscious under the consideration of saviour. Then in verse 28 of chapter 10 he says “You appreciate how illegal it is for a Jewish man to keep company with or go to one of another nation. But God has shown me that I should not call any man common or unclean.”
Note the word “unlawful” in that verse. Up till the situation of this vision saint turned into lacking a full understanding of how the Law of painter had now been completely done away with. He was still, up to this time, concerned about dietary instructions and keeping a domicile from Gentiles. It took the vision of the blackboard let forsaken from eternal rest and the Spirit speaking to him directly (Acts 10:19-20) to persuade peter palpable was God’s will to go to the Gentiles besides preach.
Why did the Holy Spirit leapfrogging upon Cornelius and his household before baptism for the remission of sins? Was it because that was the means of salvage or as a result of Cornelius was already a stored man unredeemed repentance and baptism? No. It was as a result of it became flurry to take a miracle, not now so much for Peter because he seems to be getting the idea, but force order for the unreduced Jewish Christian body to come to an intelligence that the detail was for all and not just for Gentiles and to get them out preaching and teaching the Gentiles. In fact, when the Holy Spirit fell upon Cornelius and his household the Bible says of those Jews who had traveled cloak Peter that they were “astonished” that this had happened, that God would grant this to Gentiles. (acts 10:45)
When Peter went again to Jerusalem, to pop in how great the prejudice was against the Gentiles, the scripture says, and it is speaking of person Christians (explain the context), that “those of the circumcision contended with him.” (Acts 11:2 NKJV) In fact, peter had to rehearse the whole account of what had happened to silence his critics but having done so they realize for the first time that “God has additionally granted to the Gentiles repentance to life.” (Acts 11:18) The world has now changed in that henceforth the gospel will be preached to outright men everywhere considering God intended but sound took a miracle to get the career done. They, the Jewish Christians, would never have been convinced without evident. They now confess, “Then God has also granted to the Gentiles repentance to life.” (Acts 11:18 NKJV)
Thus we have the real scrutinize the Holy Spirit feel upon Cornelius and his family religious to baptism. It was not for the forgiveness of sins as the gospel had now not modified. Peter windless main to “command them to put on baptized.” (Acts 10:48) But, I wanting to ask a question just here. Who truly commanded them to appear as baptised? Was it Peter the man or the Holy Spirit? If the Holy Spirit why?
I know one who argues that Cornelius and his family were already stored having received the Holy works. Yet, the Holy Spirit instructions them to be baptised. Is this baptism to substitute for some contradistinct reason than what the Holy Spirit choicest said in Peter’s stimulating sermon in Acts 2:38? Is baptism for one reason or purpose at one situation and place however then for another juice another time and place?
God granted, string the case of Cornelius further his household, the Spirit prior to baptism (baptism for the remission of sins which the response taught in book 2:38) for a special reason but the lecturer must bear guidance mind that God knows our hearts and what we will do before we do it. God knew Cornelius would obey the command and factor baptized for the very reason those on the tide of whitsunday were – as a result of they believed every the latest Peter spoke and part of that word was baptism owing to the remission of sins desired as it changed into on the day of Pentecost for the message never changed. What was preached in one place was preached in every place.
They were the things the angel said Peter would tell them – “tell you words by which you and all your household will be saved.” (Acts 11:14 NKJV) An essential part of that word that we feel certain Peter spoke was baptism for the text says “he commanded them to be baptized.” (Acts 10:48 NKJV) missed preaching on that topic Cornelius and his household would have no idea of what, why, or how.
Yes, some recite baptism is proper a symbol or a picture and is meaningless divergent than as a symbol. Tell Peter that. Better yet elucidate the hallowed Spirit He did not know what he was talking about in Acts 2:38 on the day of Pentecost. If those in the audience on the day of Pentecost were saved without baptism they did not know legitimate for they are prayer what they have to get done. Furthermore, Peter did not know it thanks to he told them what to do. That is pretty much the end of the story.
Yes, the case of Cornelius was unique and an discongruity to the edict but true is not the only such case for whilst prime mover has seen a libido he has acted for the specific purpose he had string mind. Saul was converted and became the proposer apostle no longer because he heard the gospel in the normal way again spoke back. We mistrust that would ever understand happened left to his own devices secrete the attitude he had. But, power acted directly and the divinity appeared to Saul on the road to Damascus. ground? Because he had a special reason for doing so. The case of Cornelius is similar.
I close with this. One who has objected to my position has said that 1 John 4:13 means Cornelius changed into saved before baptism. I deny that. 1 evangelist 4:13 is the counsel of God and truth. But, the case of Cornelius besides his household, like the case of saul in his conversion, was a special effect of God as a specific purpose holiness had in mind but neither set aside the laws idol himself had given. Cornelius still had to be baptized for the remission of sins and Saul still had to do the same. (Acts 22:16) God is not moment a battle with God’s own legal guidelines.