every so often it is easy to misunderstand passages of scripture and especially so if we are getting all kinds of aid observation ergo. Paul’s statement in 1 Cor. 1:17 is equaling a gangway. It reads now follows: “For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel.” (1 Cor. 1:17a NKJV) What is Paul saying right here? Is he saying that saviour does not burden whether or not disciples are baptized? Is he saying it is unimportant and makes no difference to one’s salvation whether he/she is baptised? It is the purpose of this article to show the hot air of taking that kind of standing based mostly on this scripture.
Let me begin by asking a question that must be replied if one is to take the standing that baptism does no longer matter and that Paul was dogma that in this passage. Here is the question, if it did not matter, if it has nothing to do with salvation, if christ did not want Paul to thin why did Paul baptize? He says in verses 14 also 16 that he baptized Crispus and Gaius and the household of Stephanas. guidance Acts 19:1-7 apostle got here to Ephesus and found 12 men there that had not been baptized properly and he baptized them. Why? why if paul felt it was unnecessary? One also finds others who were baptized either by Paul or by means of a man of his as a result of Paul’s feeling on the discipline – Lydia and her household (Acts 16:14-15) and the Philippian jailer and his family (Acts 16:29-33).
Why if Paul felt baptism was unnecessary did he translate baptism in Rom. 6:1-7, 1 Cor. 6:11, 1 Cor. 12:13, Gal. 3:26-27, Eph. 5:25-26, Col. 2:11-12, Titus 3:5, and if Paul wrote hebrews as many accept as true with he did in Heb. 10:22?
If baptism does no longer matter further Paul did not care whether individuals were baptized or not hence why was Paul baptized? Was more required of Paul than anyone else in becoming a moralistic? The command to Paul by Ananias, a companion sent directly by the Lord himself (consider Acts 9:10-16) to Paul (at that time called Saul), was “arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins.” (Acts 22:16 NKJV)
Most today, if they were to be consistent in what they teach, would accredit to tell you that Ananias was imagined and could not possibly affirm meant what he said about paul having sins to be washed away as they say a man is saved from his sins at the point of reliance and thus Paul had no sins to impersonate clean directly so they know supplementary approximately incarnate than the man sent at once by the Lord himself to apostle. They also could presuppose to label you, as a result of they consider man has no part in his own salvation other than faith, there became nothing Paul could do to help himself contrary to what Ananias told him.
One additionally has to ask an alternative question if one is to interpret 1 Cor. 1:17 as teaching that baptism does not matter to Paul or to Christ. Actually, two questions. (third) Why was Paul, an apostle, privileged from the command Jesus gave to the other apostles just before his ascension to heaven spell lusterlessness. 28:19-20 where the command was, “Go therefore again make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the actualize also of the Son besides of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all matters that I have commanded you; again lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age”? (NKJV) Is he some kind of special apostle who became exempted from this know-how to baptize? Did the disciples made by Peter, John, and the unrelated apostles have to be baptized but not those unreal by way of Paul? I hope you do now not consider that. What Peter, John, and the different apostles were commanded to do paul was also commanded to do or else he was not required to produce the Great Commission as they were and who believes that?
(2) Which disciple became it in matt. 28:18-20 that Jesus said would not need to be baptized? I strength add the disciples that were made were to be bland “to observe all things I have commanded you” which was what – to go make disciples besides baptize them. Matthew 28:19-20 settles the cause of whether baptism is essential to salvation by itself, no other passage is needed, unless of course one can deliberately disobey Jesus again soothing be kept. But, there are many, many other passages teaching the same scantiness of baptism as essential to salvation.
Paul in third Corinthians was writing to the altar that he established there. He says of it “I planted” (0.33 Cor. 3:6 NKJV); “I have laid the foundation” (1 Cor. 3:10 NKJV); “For though you might have ten thousand instructors in Christ, basically you perform not take it profuse fathers; for predominance Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel” (1 Cor. 4:15 NKJV).
The guide of the establishment of the church at city is found pressure book chapter 18. As a result of Paul’s preaching the matter says, “And populous of the Corinthians, hearing, believed and were baptized.” (Acts 18:8 NKJV) Were the converts apostle made left unbaptised because paul thought it was unimportant again did not resolve honest? Not according to this paragraph. He said in his letter to the church at city he was not sent to baptize but it is certain he taught actual or else how did the Corinthians learn about it and why were they baptised? If Paul did no longer perform the actual baptizing (and he did not close it according to 1 Cor. 1:17) then authentic is certain some of his helpers or assistants did on his behalf.
According to the book 18 account the Lord spoke to Paul telling him he had many people in Corinth (verse 10) also directing Paul to not hold his quiet but to speak up in preaching the gospel (adonic 9). paul dulled 18 months in Corinth preaching (verse 11).
In 1 Cor. 6:11 Paul, after speaking of sins that will prohibit one from inheriting the kingdom of world spirit (verses 9 and 10), says to the Corinthians, “And equal were any of you. But you were washed