A great many people believe, it seems, that Cornelius was

A great many people believe, it seems, that Cornelius was saved the moment the Holy haste fell on him to which I disagree.  It seems to be a problem of interest so I have decided to write on the subject from a different vantage point than is usual. 
This is really, at its core, a discussion of whether or no longer water baptism is for the remission of sins as stated in Acts 2:38.  Since that is the basis of opposition every related subject such now conversion, the new birth, and baptism cover into or bear upon the case of Cornelius. 

I want to deal curtain something I had neglected myself until I was doing a little reading situation it became brought to my attention.  In his articulation to Cornelius further his family saint mentioned in Acts 10:43, “To Him all the prophets witness that, through His name, whoever believes in Him commit obtain remission of sins.” (NKJV)  In the acutely next verse (adonic 44) we are told that “While Peter become still speaking these words, the religious bag fell upon all those who heard the word.” (Acts 10:44 NKJV) 
I want you to take a closer look at verse 43.  There are three words well-qualified I had overlooked.  What were they?  The words “through His name”.  It was unqualified extraneous to me that words do have meanings and they are not just in there to take up space.  “Through His name, whoever believes in Him will have remission of sins.”  
Here is the point, the phrase “through His name” designates a relationship obscure the name.  Meaning what?  in that that part we have to go back to the eminent Commission Jesus gave himself fix Matt. 28:18-20.  permit me quote that. 
“And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, ‘All weight has been habituated to Me fame heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the concoct and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, opinion them to observe all things that I admit commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.’ Amen.” (matt. 28:18-20 NKJV) 
Here is something the reader also can not be aware of.  Do you comprehend the word “in” where bona fide says “in the name” should correctly be translated by the word “into”?  That is to say the Greek capability “into.”  If you do not believe that okay it out for yourself by getting a New alabaman standard original edition reference bible and shake on the aspect margin, or center column, references out.  If you do not have one here is what you will find, the exact words, “Lit., into”.  Lit. means literal, hypothesis “into” is the literal translation.  
The fixed american Standard translation of 1901 used the word “into” as does the more recent Literal Translation of the Bible in the text itself instead of the word “in”.  
So what is the big animation as I do not want to evade your attention by doing snap word studies?  jesus is viewpoint that when we are baptized in humidify whereas per Acts 2:38 we are being baptized into a relationship not only with himself but also with the shape and the holy Spirit.  Does this comport with discrepant scriptures.  Yes, it does.  right here are any passages that do not just teach that we are baptized into Christ however specifically state it.  (I add no one doubts that the baptism of the Great Commission is water baptism since man is directed to perform it.)  
“Or do you now not know that as many of us because were baptized interestedness Christ Jesus were baptized into His death?” (Rom. 6:3 NKJV)  dame. 3:27, “For since numerous of you thanks to were baptized racket Christ take it put on Christ.” (NKJV)  One gets into Christ by water baptism. 
Please note what Paul stated in 1 Cor. 1:13, “Is Christ divided? Was apostle crucified for you? Or have been you baptized in the name of Paul?” (NKJV)  produce you know that the tip-off “in” right here should be the word “into”?  Again, check it out using the references I accept already alluded to.  The Corinthians were not considering baptized into a courting with apostle but take cover Christ and he wanted them to know that. 
I think it goes without saying that all are agreed the Christian has a relationship ensconce the Holy reaction and the scriptures also manifest the same courting with the plan and Jesus.  Hear Jesus, “If any one loves Me, he will keep My tip-off (Is baptism due to the remission of sins, Acts 2:38, a part of the word? – DS); and My initiate entrust love him, and We will clock in to him and do Our home with him.” (John 14:23 NKJV)  savior again speaks in John 17:20-21, “I do not pray for these alone, but additionally for those who consign agree with in Me through their word; that they all may be one, as You, Father, are in Me, and I rule You; that they also may epitomize one in Us, that the world may believe that You sent Me.” (NKJV)  regard additionally Rom. 8:9-11. 
The point I am trying to make is when we are baptised according to Jesus, in the giving of the Great Commission, we are put into that relationship with him where he dwells within us, as does the Father, and the Holy Spirit – we in them, they ascendancy us.  In voluntarily coming into this relationship we are gladly also gladly bringing ourselves into submission to their combined authority and receive all the blessings that go along lock up doing that. 
That the baptism of the Great fee turned into wet baptism goes without asserting as the command was made to guys to do this to others.  Only God, now not man, answerability baptize one in the holy Spirit.  Furthermore, those they taught and baptised were to go out further carry through the same involvement (“teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you” Matt. 28:20 NKJV) and that perpetually down through time.  This is the “one baptism” of Eph. 4:5 and the baptism that establishes a relationship take cover Christ. 
Now let us found application to the case of Cornelius.  I quote once again Acts 10:43, “To Him whole-hog the prophets witness that, through His name, whoever believes in Him will receive remission of sins.” (NKJV)  So here is the argument.  That which we are to receive through his name (remission of sins) is a snap hard to receive, is factual not, unless again until we have some relationship hold back that name (with him)?  That courting is granted via approach of obedience to the Great Commission during which we are baptized into a relationship with Christ, again the Father, and the blessed Spirit. 
But, there is more.  What did the Great fee of jesus ropes Matt. 28 grill of a man?  Two things – faith and baptism. (Matt. 28:19)  Disciples were chief to be made from which it is evident that believers were to be made and ergo they were to be baptized.  Mark 16:16 makes it even clearer.  “He who believes and is baptized will be saved; however he who does not consider will be condemned.” (Mark 16:16 NKJV)  I have said before and say again the challenge with sectarian dogma on this subject is that the import of what they teach is the same as if Mark 16:16 read, “He who believes besides is not baptized commit produce saved” for they say irrefutable is not essential.  I believe Jesus’ words are clear. 
Do I think true was certain that Cornelius may be saved?  Absolutely, just in that a good deal as the Old Testament prophets who were given the Holy Spirit but neither were saved without the blood of Jesus with which we expose bag contact with by means of baptism in our age or dispensation, the Christian dispensation.  Paul says we are baptised into Christ’s death which is where he shed his blood, “Or do you not know that through many of us now have been baptized into saviour savior were baptized into His death?” (Rom 6:3 NKJV)  
Now, would omnipotent area his spirit upon matchless not yet sway a saved condition?  He could, none of us would contradict his power to do so.  could he do it?  Who is to say he may not if he had a purpose in doing so?  Might there be a purpose here?  What? 
The gospel changed into not being taken to the Gentiles as daemon intended.  Some verbalize as much as 10 years had transpired between that first speech on the Day of whitsunday also Peter reaction to Cornelius, a Gentile.  Even with Peter, an inspired apostle, it took direct intervention from God himself to persuade him he foremost to go and speak with Cornelius.  And, full-dress bible students know, that hard by the fact he took a lot of flack in that it from the Jews back in Jerusalem and had to defend himself.  What convinced those Jews perceptible was acceptable?  Peter’s recounting the fact that the sanctified Spirit fell on the Gentiles.  Would they immoderately have gone on their own to the Gentiles had this not happened? 
When God has a goal he also can give his spirit to like a vile sinner.  Certainly, I do not place Cornelius consequence helping such class, but I do know he needed the blood of Jesus.  But, what I have passage to right here is the case of one so vile he turned into a ring commander in the necrosis of savior – Caiaphas. 
The Bible says, “And one of them, Caiaphas, being high priest that year, said to them, “You know nothing at all, nor do you consider that it is expedient for us that one man should model for the people, and not that the whole nation should perish.” through this he did not assert on his own authority; but being high priest that year he prophesied that jesus might die for the nation.”  (John 11:49-51 NKJV) 
Do I regard the holy Spirit remained with Caiaphas?  Of course not.  But, since a short period of circumstance because God had a purpose it was given to him.  God had a purpose in gift the Holy commotion to Cornelius again his household.  He completed that purpose.  The Holy Spirit was not accustomed to Cornelius to save him nor was it disposed to him because he was already saved.  be pleased each person in addition Cornelius had to believe and comply the gospel to epitomize saved and that included through baptised seeing the remission of sins or as Jesus put it, “He who believes also is baptized will express saved; however he who does not believe will be condemned.” (Mark 16:16 NKJV)


Related posts